next up previous contents
Next: Frequency shift methods Up: Order tracking Previous: Resample method   Contents

STFT methods

This is also a fairly straightforward method. Perform a Short Time Fourier Transform 8.1 (i.e. split the vibration signal up into segments and perform an FFT on each segment), and then for each segment pull out the amplitude of the bin which is at the frequency that corresponds to the shaft speed (or 2/rev, or whatever). Despite the simplicity, I generally do not recommend this method for many reasons:

These various disadvantages can sometimes be mitigated if you are post-processing data after the fact and you can play around with different settings until you get a good answer. But the disadvantages are usually exacerbated for real-time monitoring.

The one advantage of the STFT method is if you want to track multiple different harmonics simultaneously. E.g. if you want to get the 1/rev and the 2/rev and the 3/rev and the 4/rev, etc., etc., you can get all of them in one computation. With some of the other methods you would have to repeat the entire calculation again for each harmonic to track.

The resample method described previously, requires no time-frequency tradeoff, has no picket fence effect, requires less processing power, and allows constant order bandwidth. Therefore I would recommend that as a better method to start with.

Figure 34:
Image stft_order_track_example


next up previous contents
Next: Frequency shift methods Up: Order tracking Previous: Resample method   Contents " . $row['Name'] . " Posted on " . $row['DateTime']; echo "
"; echo $row['Comment']; echo "

"; } echo "
"; ?> Leave a comment on this page:

Name: (optional)
To prove you are not a robot, what is 2+3?

Creative Commons License
This work by Daniel Kiracofe (daniel dot kiracofe at gmail dot com) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License./' $I